The Exposure Report | HR Architecture Advisory

The Exposure Report

Your HR infrastructure assessed. Every gap named. Every risk sequenced.

Most founders find out what their HR exposure looks like the hard way. A termination dispute that was not documented. An EEOC charge arriving before anyone knew the classification was wrong. A complaint against a manager who had no investigation protocol. By the time those moments arrive, the record is already written. The Exposure Report shows you that record before something forces you to find out what it says. It is a full forensic assessment of your HR infrastructure, delivered in writing within 5 business days of the diagnostic session, by the person who spent 30 years building the systems it is measured against.

Noël Tarquinii SHRM-SCP

This is what it is not

Not this: you already had a vendor review your handbook last year. It passed. That review was done by someone who has never been in the room where your handbook gets used to build a case against you.

Not this: you already use a fractional HR platform. They run the day-to-day. They handle the onboarding checklist. They have never read your termination records through the lens of someone building the employer position statement.

Not this: you already spoke to an employment attorney. They told you you were probably fine. They reviewed the documentation that exists. They cannot review the documentation that is missing: and missing documentation is what loses cases.

Risk Categories

Every finding in the Exposure Report is assigned a risk level and a priority sequence.

The number of findings is determined by what the company's situation actually shows. There is no ceiling and no template. Noël documents everything the assessment surfaces.

Critical

Address before the next personnel decision

A gap that produces direct, near-term legal exposure. A classification relationship that fails the IRS common-law test. An arbitration clause that is unenforceable in two active states. A termination record with no documentation. A complaint pattern in a manager's file with no response protocol. These findings require action before the next people decision is made.

Timeline: Before next personnel decision

Defense costs for a single employment claim: $75,000 to $300,000+ depending on how far it goes. Federal Title VII caps damages at $50,000 to $300,000: but back pay and front pay are NOT capped. In state no-cap jurisdictions, the jury decides the number with no ceiling. A critical finding is the gap that produces that claim. It exists right now. Every day it remains unaddressed is a day the exposure builds.

Elevated

Address within the next cycle

A gap that builds exposure over time. A handbook that covers three of four active states. A documentation standard that is inconsistent across managers. A compliance calendar that does not include new-state trigger dates. These findings are not immediate crises. They become crises when the trigger event arrives.

Timeline: Within the next cycle

The EEOC received 88,531 new private sector charges in FY2024: a 9.2% increase and the third consecutive year of growth. That is one channel. The EEOC received 88,531 new charges against private sector and state/local government employers in FY2024: a 9.2% increase and the third consecutive year of growth. That is one channel. Add the federal sector: approximately 12,000 to 14,000 formal complaints filed annually across 277+ federal agencies. The Department of Defense alone employs 750,000 civilians and processes hundreds of EEO complaints internally each year: a parallel system entirely separate from the EEOC published count. Add state FEPA charges processed only under state law: estimated 40,000 to 60,000 annually. Add pre-complaint EEO counseling contacts that resolve before a formal charge is ever filed. Total employment discrimination activity across all channels exceeds 300,000 annual filings. The 88,531 EEOC figure is the most visible number. It is not the total. Total across all channels exceeds 300,000 annual filings. The Department of Defense alone employs 750,000 civilians and processes EEO complaints through a parallel system that the 88,531 number does not capture. An elevated finding becomes a critical finding the moment the trigger event arrives. In this environment, triggers arrive.

Monitor

Track and address on retainer timeline

A gap that exists but does not require immediate action. A policy that is technically compliant but will need updating when a specific law takes effect. A documentation process that works but has inconsistencies that could matter at scale. These findings do not create near-term exposure, but they require monitoring.

Timeline: Ongoing monitoring

Low does not mean irrelevant. It means the timeline is longer and other priorities come first. In the hands of a retainer relationship, low findings are resolved before they elevate. Without one, they sit until something changes.

Sample Finding

What an Exposure Report finding looks like in practice.

This is a representative example from a worker classification finding. The format, depth, and specificity are consistent across all findings in every Exposure Report.

Finding 3 of 7: Worker Classification Critical

What Was Found

The company has 11 contractors who have been working exclusively for the company for 18 months or more. Several have company email addresses, attend internal meetings, and use company equipment. Six have no written contractor agreement. All 11 relationships were reviewed against the IRS common-law test and the ABC test in applicable state jurisdictions. Eight of the 11 fail the IRS common-law test. Three of those eight also fail the ABC test in their state of residence.

Why This Is a Critical Finding

Worker misclassification triggers IRS penalties of 20% of all wages paid and 100% of FICA taxes on both employer and employee shares for the full period of misclassification, plus penalties of $1,000 per misclassified worker per year. The IRS audit window reaches back six years. The Voluntary Classification Settlement Program is currently available: it reduces this liability to approximately 10% of one year's employment taxes for the most recent year. That option exists only before an inquiry opens. The moment an inquiry opens, the settlement window closes permanently.

$340,000 to $480,000

Retroactive reclassification by the IRS would trigger liability for 100% of FICA taxes on both employer and employee shares for the full period of misclassification, plus 20% of all wages paid, plus penalties of $1,000 per misclassified worker per year. The IRS audit window reaches back six years. Estimated retroactive exposure based on contractor compensation reviewed: $340,000 to $480,000 before penalties and interest: and before the IRS penalty ceiling of $1,329,000 per year for small businesses under $5M revenue applies to any year within that six-year window. The Voluntary Classification Settlement Program is currently available. It reduces this liability to approximately 10% of one year employment taxes for the most recent year. That option exists only before an inquiry opens. The moment an inquiry opens, the settlement window closes permanently. This company had 18 months of exposure already built. The IRS audit window would have reached back further than the working relationships themselves.

Source: IRS Common-Law Test · DOL Final Rule March 2024 · IRS Penalty Schedule · ABLEMKR IRS Penalty Analysis 2026 · IRS Criminal Penalty Schedule (up to $1,000 per worker per year, up to 1 year imprisonment per violation)

Recommended Action Sequence

1. Apply IRS common-law test to all 11 relationships with documented rationale. 2. Identify which contractors should be reclassified as employees. 3. Build structured transition plan for reclassification with appropriate effective dates. 4. For remaining contractors, execute updated agreements with scope-of-work limitations designed to support legitimate contractor status. 5. File under the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program before any inquiry opens. 6. Establish ongoing classification review process for all new contractor engagements.

The founder who does not have the Exposure Report

Makes a termination decision this week without knowing the documentation record behind it.

Renews a contractor relationship without knowing whether it survives a classification audit.

Gets a complaint against a manager and has no investigation protocol to reference.

Receives an EEOC charge and pulls the personnel file. The file has one document from three years ago.

Defense begins from whatever the record already shows. It cannot be changed now.

The founder who does

Knows exactly what the record shows before any of those moments arrive.

Knows which gaps are critical and which can wait.

Makes the termination decision with the documentation architecture in place.

Renews or reclassifies the contractor with written rationale on file.

Walks into the EEOC process with a personnel file that reflects the actual performance history. Defense begins from a position of documented strength. The record was built intentionally. Verdicts in state no-cap cases reached $238 million, $103 million, $32.3 million, $900 million. None of those employers planned for that outcome.

The diagnostic is the only thing that determines which of those two founders is in the room when something goes wrong.

“Noël walked through that report like she had been in our company for years. She knew what was missing before I finished explaining the situation. The action sequence she gave us in that call is the reason we have not had a single employment claim in 18 months.”

COO, 78-person healthcare company

After the Report

The Exposure Report stands on its own. What follows depends on what it shows.

The report is delivered. The debrief call walks through every finding. Noël states the priority order directly. If the findings do not justify a paid engagement, she says so. The report stands regardless of what follows. No obligation to continue. No sales follow-up unless you initiate it.

If critical findings exist

HR Infrastructure Build

Hands-on remediation of the gaps the report identified. Policies, documentation frameworks, classification architecture, investigation protocols. Built for the company's specific size, industry, and jurisdictions.

See Investment Options →

If an active situation exists

Investigation File Review

For companies with a live complaint, active internal investigation, or received EEOC charge. Strategic assessment of what the documentation record shows and what needs to happen before a response is built.

See Active Situation Options →

If the report shows clean position

No Engagement Required

If the Exposure Report shows a company in a clean position with no material gaps, Noël says so directly in the debrief call. That outcome happens. It is not the common one, but it happens. The report stands on its own regardless of what follows.

See Case Studies →

Start Here

The diagnostic costs nothing to request. What it finds costs more to ignore.

The Exposure Report is delivered within 5 business days. No obligation to continue. No follow-up unless you initiate it. If the findings do not justify a paid engagement, Noël says so directly in the debrief call.

HRArchitectureADVISORY

This is not a law firm. Nothing constitutes legal advice. All engagements in strict confidence.

Noël Tarquinii, SHRM-SCP  ·  Strategic Case Architect  ·  © 2026 HR Architecture Advisory  ·  Sources: EEOC FY2024 APR · IRS Penalty Schedule · Nakase Law Firm 2024 · Proskauer 2024–2026